However, we do not apologize for raising a wide variety of issues that may frustrate even the most patient reader. In such a short paper, we cannot pretend to cover the subject of socioeconomic consequences in any depth. As a result, published projections that implicitly adopt current economic and social arrangements should be questioned as well. There is, on the other hand, no shortage of assumptions regarding the nation's institutions, individual behavior, and the likelihood of social change, none of which have been seriously questioned. To our knowledge, little has been done on such subjects as social response to a warning of nuclear attack willingness of health care organizations to administer aid under postattack conditions ability of a moneyless economy to rebuild without the aid of other nations and without a heavy reliance on fuel oils. Much of the work was performed in the mid-1960s to mid-1970s and is therefore dated. The citations that were uncovered appeared to be confined almost entirely to the application of economic theory to problems of reconstruction. However, a review of the literature on the consequences of nuclear war revealed few references to social science research. As work progressed, it became increasingly apparent that research into the direct and immediate impact of war has been, and continues to be, the subject of considerable effort. The original purpose of this paper was to assess the systemic effects of a limited nuclear war and offer some thoughts regarding the potential health care complications that might result.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |